American Islam and Trying to Downgrade Islamic Ideals

Navideshahed: It is clear that when there are geographical disputes, discussing the religious, practical and non-artist subjects, leads to violations of these interpretations; and the quarrels and disputes which exist in this field will be against tact. If we think that we have done a service to Ahl Beit and Shiites by this work, we should know that that we are absolutely wrong.

News ID: ۳۴۹۹۹۹

چهارشنبه - ۱۶ مرداد ۲۰۱۲ / 2012 16 May

Some time ago, Shiite News”? suggested changing the names of the three islands for the purpose of standing against the anti-Shiites thoughts of the governors of Persian Gulf countries.

The writer of the abovementioned article wrote: What made me to write this article was the plan of changing the names of three Iranian islands including the Greater Tunb, the Lesser Tunb, and Abu Musa into three sacred names of Kusar, Saghalein and Al-Ghadir. It means the name of Greater Tunb to become Kusar, the Lesser Tunb to become Saghalein and Abu Musa to become Al-Ghadir.

These good names will cause a higher blessing to these permanent Iranian islands and they will be considered as a thistle in the eyes of anti-Shiites heads of Wahhabism and some of the regional countries and to be considered as a lesson to the innocent minds that have faced with transient hallucinations.

The Islamic Republic’s ruling to the three islands is a historical issue which is documented based on the international documents. During the recent years the newly established country of UAE with some false and wrong claims has claimed Iran of occupying these islands and this claim has been supported by the regional countries located near Persian Gulf and Arab Union.

It seems some authorities without paying attention to the national advantages and with the pretext of fighting against Wahhabism in some suspicious activities try to change the issue of three islands into religious disputes based on the excesses seeking of the rulers of the Emirates.

The question is here why there is no suggestion to change the names of Kish or Qeshm into religious names? Is discussing the changing of the names of the Islands that have been argued by the UAE and now during the few weeks as the topic of tensions under the thought of public opinion in the region and world and changing their names to Shiites symbols as an invitation of Muslims to unity? Or is this another page to invite them to intensify the tensions? Although the claim of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Shiites principles and promoting the mottos and occasions related to Ahl Beit is something irreversible damage.

It is true that the three keywords Ghadir, Saghalein and Kusar are the words which can have the source and inspiration of unity, but it does not mean that in a border conflict such keywords to be provided. It is clear that mentioning the keywords which can stimulate and intensify the feelings of extremists is not in the advantage of region and it put the region into tensions more than before and more Muslims will be taken into non-unity.

The great Islamic revolution and subject of religion

There is no doubt that the level of influence and popularity that it has gotten among the Arabic brothers and neighbors is not sourced from arguments, but also it has been sourced from the industry of art and developing the joint objectives between the Muslim nations and during the contemporary time the Shiites have gotten victories as well.

It is clear that among the geographical quarrel, discussing the religious, practical and non-artist subjects leads to violations of these interpretations; among those quarrels everything will be against tact. If we think that we have done a service to Ahl Beit and Shiites by this work, we should know that that we are absolutely wrong.

The Islamic revolution and the system which has been sourced from it, although it has been inspired from the Ahl Beit (AS) percepts and pure Islam, but it did not got a Shiites ID card for itself and it only supported the flag of Islam for itself. According to this thought, this system was able to absorb many of the Sunnis and make a peace between Shiites and Sunnis. In fact this government aimed to remove the misunderstanding of some of the Islamic sects regarding the issue of Islam. What is named as Islamic Awakening is indeed sourced from this thought that Islam will never confirm the cruel ruler, although he might be a Muslim.

Nationalism and sectarianism are the two edges of a scissors

While Imam Khomeini raised the flag of fighting, he did his struggle to revive the speeches of pure Islam of Mohammad (May God send greetings to him) in the world, creating the global party of the poor, Islamic awakening and uprising against the hired governors of the west, today two apparently different currents try to shorten this issue. Some with nationalism attempt to put the diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran away from the eleven constitutional articles in which has been mentioned:

“According to the holy Koran verse which says: All the Muslims are one nation and the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is obliged to put its policy based on coalition and unity of Islamic nations and to attempt seriously to realize the political, economical and cultural unity in the Islamic world.”?
Another group by stating the religious issues either the Shiites issues or Sunnis issues attempt to lead the diplomacy of the Islamic Revolution towards the sectarianism literature and to put it away from its essential goals.

The End

Some time ago, Shiite News”? suggested changing the names of the three islands for the purpose of standing against the anti-Shiites thoughts of the governors of Persian Gulf countries. The writer of the abovementioned article wrote: What made me to write this article was the plan of changing the names of three Iranian islands including the Greater Tunb, the Lesser Tunb, and Abu Musa into three sacred names of Kusar, Saghalein and Al-Ghadir. It means the name of Greater Tunb to become Kusar, the Lesser Tunb to become Saghalein and Abu Musa to become Al-Ghadir. These good names will cause a higher blessing to these permanent Iranian islands and they will be considered as a thistle in the eyes of anti-Shiites heads of Wahhabism and some of the regional countries and to be considered as a lesson to the innocent minds that have faced with transient hallucinations. The Islamic Republic’s ruling to the three islands is a historical issue which is documented based on the international documents. During the recent years the newly established country of UAE with some false and wrong claims has claimed Iran of occupying these islands and this claim has been supported by the regional countries located near Persian Gulf and Arab Union. It seems some authorities without paying attention to the national advantages and with the pretext of fighting against Wahhabism in some suspicious activities try to change the issue of three islands into religious disputes based on the excesses seeking of the rulers of the Emirates. The question is here why there is no suggestion to change the names of Kish or Qeshm into religious names? Is discussing the changing of the names of the Islands that have been argued by the UAE and now during the few weeks as the topic of tensions under the thought of public opinion in the region and world and changing their names to Shiites symbols as an invitation of Muslims to unity? Or is this another page to invite them to intensify the tensions? Although the claim of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Shiites principles and promoting the mottos and occasions related to Ahl Beit is something irreversible damage. It is true that the three keywords Ghadir, Saghalein and Kusar are the words which can have the source and inspiration of unity, but it does not mean that in a border conflict such keywords to be provided. It is clear that mentioning the keywords which can stimulate and intensify the feelings of extremists is not in the advantage of region and it put the region into tensions more than before and more Muslims will be taken into non-unity. The great Islamic revolution and subject of religion There is no doubt that the level of influence and popularity that it has gotten among the Arabic brothers and neighbors is not sourced from arguments, but also it has been sourced from the industry of art and developing the joint objectives between the Muslim nations and during the contemporary time the Shiites have gotten victories as well. It is clear that among the geographical quarrel, discussing the religious, practical and non-artist subjects leads to violations of these interpretations; among those quarrels everything will be against tact. If we think that we have done a service to Ahl Beit and Shiites by this work, we should know that that we are absolutely wrong. The Islamic revolution and the system which has been sourced from it, although it has been inspired from the Ahl Beit (AS) percepts and pure Islam, but it did not got a Shiites ID card for itself and it only supported the flag of Islam for itself. According to this thought, this system was able to absorb many of the Sunnis and make a peace between Shiites and Sunnis. In fact this government aimed to remove the misunderstanding of some of the Islamic sects regarding the issue of Islam. What is named as Islamic Awakening is indeed sourced from this thought that Islam will never confirm the cruel ruler, although he might be a Muslim. Nationalism and sectarianism are the two edges of a scissors While Imam Khomeini raised the flag of fighting, he did his struggle to revive the speeches of pure Islam of Mohammad (May God send greetings to him) in the world, creating the global party of the poor, Islamic awakening and uprising against the hired governors of the west, today two apparently different currents try to shorten this issue. Some with nationalism attempt to put the diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran away from the eleven constitutional articles in which has been mentioned: “According to the holy Koran verse which says: All the Muslims are one nation and the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is obliged to put its policy based on coalition and unity of Islamic nations and to attempt seriously to realize the political, economical and cultural unity in the Islamic world.”? Another group by stating the religious issues either the Shiites issues or Sunnis issues attempt to lead the diplomacy of the Islamic Revolution towards the sectarianism literature and to put it away from its essential goals. The End